Performance profiles of university rugby 7s players in Fiji: Findings from an exploratory study

Abstract

Problem Statement: This exploratory mixed-methods study explores self-assessed performance profiles of ten Fijian university Rugby 7s players, focusing on discrepancies between current performance (CP) and ideal performance (IP) across tactical, technical, physical, and psychological domains. Materials and Methods: Participants completed Butler and Hardy's performance profiling grids, rating their competencies on a 10-point Likert scale. This quantitative data was supplemented with qualitative reflections to comprehensively understand performance perceptions. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests to assess the significance of the observed discrepancies. Results: Significant disparities were found between CP and IP across technical (Δ up to +2.3 for offloading) and tactical skills (largest gap: +2.7 in game flow management; p < 0.01), while physical fitness showed negligible or negative discrepancies, reflecting perceived overperformance. Positional analysis revealed that forwards prioritized physical dominance (CP = 8.7 ± 1.2) and psychological resilience (CP = 9.3 ± 1.1), while backline players emphasized tactical adaptability (CP = 6.8 ± 1.3). Psychological gaps were particularly evident in decision-making, resilience, and trust. These results underscore a misalignment between perceived athletic strengths and actual technical/tactical preparedness, influenced by Fiji's cultural valorization of natural athleticism. Discussion: Findings challenge the adequacy of current selfassessment practices and expose the risks of over-relying on innate talent. The depth and nature of gaps suggest a need for position-specific and culturally responsive interventions. While improvisational flair is a historic strength of Fijian rugby, it may hinder systematic skill acquisition and psychological development. Conclusion: University Rugby 7s programs should integrate structured, position-specific training and objective assessment feedback while respecting cultural identity to optimize performance and bridge the gap between current proficiency and elite standards. Investing in coach education, evidence-based practice, and targeted resource allocation will be critical for sustainable athlete development and international competitiveness. Future research should examine broader cohorts and the longitudinal impact of culturally informed interventions. Keywords: Tactical knowledge, Technical skills, Physical fitness, Psychological resilience, Position-specific training, Player development.